History of geospatial technology
At the GITA conference in March 2007, I put together a few
slides talking about my personal perspective on the history
of geospatial technology moving to the mainstream, which
Geoff Zeiss talked about in his blog, kindly saying that
he thought this was interesting. The list of bullets I put
together was as follows:
- Early 1980's - IBM GFIS stored data in its
hierarchical database DL/1
- ~1986 - IBM partner IFM releases Infoter, which
stores spatial data in SQL/DS and DB2
- ~1988 - IBM launched geoManager, which stores
spatial data in SQL/DS and DB2
- Late 1980's - Canadian company GeoVision develops
VISION*, based on Oracle
- 1991 - I wrote an article "Why use a standard RDBMS
for GIS?"
- 1991 - Smallworld GIS is released, introducing some
radical new ideas which jump it ahead. Its proprietary
language and database offer significant advantages at
the time.
- 1992 AM/FM conference: "1995: the year the GIS
disappeared", by Doug Seaborn
- 1995 - "Oracle multi-dimension" announced at the GIS
95 conference in Vancouver
- 1996 - MapQuest is launched, the first online
mapping site
- Late 90's - geospatial technologies begin to
transition to using mainstream software development
languages
- 1999 - Microsoft MapPoint released
- Jan 2001 - Keyhole founded
- Oct 2004 - Google buys Keyhole, which becomes Google
Earth
- 2005 - Google launches Google Maps; appearance of
Ajax web technologies; Microsoft, Yahoo, others, get in
on the act Nov
- 2006 - Microsoft launches new 3D building models in
Virtual Earth
Anyway, I thought I would write a bit more on some of the
historical items over time.
To kick this off, I recently found a copy of the first
significant article I had published regarding use of
relational database technology for GIS, back in 1990 - it
was entitled "Exploiting Relational Database Technology in
GIS", and was published in Mapping Awareness magazine in the
UK (and slightly modified versions subsequently appeared in
various other publications). It is interesting how long this
vision has taken to become reality, though we are finally
there now in general (although there are still some who talk
about these ideas as if they are new, even today). To read
an HTML version of the article,
look here, and for a
PDF scan of the original magazine article (1.26MB),
click here. |